• Pandemic

    Yesterday, some family members were expressing some feelings of helplessness and inevitability in response to the COVID-19 crisis. This is what I wrote:

    By definition, a pandemic is a global crisis. Taking measures to protect the life of the most vulnerable, is not prolonging the inevitable. Yes, a lot of people are going to die. The difference between action and inaction could be millions of people. The economy is important, in as much as it is the mechanism for distributing goods and promoting wellness. We must think about what we can do to promote wellness for the majority of people. We are all on the same boat. At the moment, our role is social distancing. It can’t last forever. The dichotomy that presents millions of death or the economy as the only two options is false. If efforts are directed – as has been done previously in times of war – we can have both. With massive and repetitive testing programs for detecting infection, early isolation, etc we can start returning to normal life eventually.

    Humanity has a enormous capacity to produce cars, televisions, phones, and apps. That capacity can also be used to produce respirators, virus test kits, personal protection equipment, toilet paper and vaccines for all the population.

    The current world leadership worries me a lot, but I don’t accept the feeling of inevitability. This is a difficult test for humanity, but we can face it on.


    The original version in Spanish:

    Por definición una pandemia es una crisis mundial. Tomar medidas para proteger la vida de los más vulnerables, no es postergar lo inevitable. Si, se va morir mucha gente, pero la diferencia son millones de personas. La economía es importante, en función que es el mecanismo para distribuir bienes y promover el bienestar. Debemos de pensar en lo que podemos hacer para promover el bienestar de la mayoría de la personas. Todos estamos en el mismo barco. Por el momento lo que nos toca hacer, es el distanciamiento social. No se puede mantener para siempre. La dicotomía que divide las opciones entre millones de muertes y la economía es falsa. Si se orientan los esfuerzos – como se ha hecho anteriormente en tiempos de guerra – se pueden tener las dos. Con programas de pruebas de virus masivas y repetidas para detectar infecciones, aislamiento temprano, etc se puede empezar a regresar a la normalidad eventualmente.

    La humanidad tiene una capacidad inmensa de producir coches, televisiones, teléfonos y apps. Esa capacidad también puede producir respiradores, pruebas de virus, material de protección personal, papel de baño, y vacunas para toda la población.

    El liderazgo actual mundial me tiene muy preocupado, pero no acepto el sentimiento de inevitabilidad. Esta es una prueba muy difícil para la humanidad, pero se puede encarar.

    Read on →

  • The REPL: Issue 66 - February 2020

    Challenges with distributed systems

    Jacob Gabrielson about the challenges of distributed systems at Amazon. He comes up with failures modes inherent in all distributes systems, and calls them the eight failure modes of the apocalypse. Engineering distributed systems is hard, being cognizant about all failure modes helps by providing some structure to tackling the problem.

    Rails has added strict loading mode to prevent lazy loading

    Rohit Kumar points out that Rails 6.1 will add strict loading support. With it turned on, Rails will raise an error instead of allowing association lazy loading. I welcome this change. Lazy loading seems like a feature that speeds up development in Rails, but is the cause of N+1 queries. I have yet to work on Rails app that doesn’t have performance issues because of this.

    On recursive queries

    Egor Rogov gives an overview of the recursive syntax in SQL, and walks through a step-by-step example of how to write a useful, performant recursive query, that solves a realistic business-logic example.

    Read on →

  • The REPL: Issue 65 - January 2020

    The No-Code Delusion

    Alex Hudson writes a post tackles the idea that soon, we will be able to produce software with significant functionality that doesn’t require coding. I agree with author’s conclusions: The goal is probably a pipe-dream that has been oversold. I’ll add that I’ve been the block a few times, and seen that software generated without change control quickly becomes unmaintainable. Back in the day, MS Access allowed power users to deal with data in a much better fashion than excel files. However, evolving them was very painful.

    3 ways Webpack surprises web developers

    I wish I had read Ross Kaffenberger’s post 2 or 3 months ago, when trying to use Webpack in a brand new Rails 6 application for the first time. I was especially confused how Webpack expects css dependency declarations in javascript.

    A forty year career

    In is an inspiring post by Will Larson, discusses career growth in software engineering. He divides the area of focus into Pace, People, Prestige, Profit, and Learning. Growth in different areas comes at different times. Like in finance, investing early brings compounding gains.

    Read on →

  • Book Review: SQL Performance Explained

    Relational database management systems are battle-tested technology that continues to be the go-to technology for a broad spectrum of applications. While not strictly necessary, the interface the most common RDBMS is through writing SQL. In this book, Markus Winand writes a thorough guide to understanding the performance of SQL databases.

    Read on →

  • Deployments With Schema Migrations

    Deploying code that depends on database schema migrations successfully requires putting some thought into when to run them during the deployment. This post develops a framework to reason about it, through analysis of a specific code example and multiple kinds of deployments. While the example is specific to Ruby on Rails, the lesson carries over to any similar web framework.

    Read on →